Filed under: Think Pieces | Tags: Bill Clinton, David Bowie, Mikhail Gorbachev, Patrick Stewar, Peter and the Wolf, Sean Connery, Sophia Loren, Sting, Wolf Tracks
What do Mikhail Gorbachev, David Bowie, Bill Clinton, Sting, Sophia Loren and Patrick Stewart have in common? “Peter and the Wolf!”
In case you happened to miss the newest version of “Peter and the Wolf” airing on PBS the other night, here’s a little video showing the making of it, or if you prefer, you can click on this link to go to a clip.
Unfortunately, I haven’t yet been able to find a full video of this amazing, Oscar winning short. But I
thought I’d take this opportunity to gush a little bit on one of my favorite music pieces.
“Peter and the Wolf” has an illustrious history. Written in 1936 by Sergei Prokofiev in just one week, the piece features both a narrator and musical parts, with different instruments representing each of the different character in the story (the cat is the clarinet, Peter is represented by the string section, etc.). The characters are also personified with their own melodies, Peter’s melody is upbeat and hopeful, the bird’s flute song sounds like, well, a singing bird. And when multiple characters are in a scene, for example when the cat tries to eat the bird, their instruments and their melodies interact. By tying the music to a story, and each of the instruments to a character, “Peter and the Wolf” teaches children to identify different orchestral instruments and parse them out from a larger piece of music.
The story is about Peter (duh) who leaves the gate open one day, which the Duck takes as an opportunity to go
swimming in the pond. Various shenanigans occur with his animal friends until the wolf emerges and eats the duck, whole and alive. Peter then catches the wolf and is celebrated as a hero.
Since then it has reappeared in a number of different versions with a host of celebrities lending their talents. In 1946, Disney made an animated version which appeared before “Fantasia.” This version was slightly more kid friendly, the duck is chased by the wolf and presumed eaten, until he emerges at the end after the wolf is caught. Joy ensues.
Since then versions have been recorded narrated by David Bowie, Sean Connery, Sting, Patrick Stewart and Alec Guinness aka Obi-Wan Kenobi. There’s just something about this piece that attracts British actors famous for playing fantasy roles.
Tiny Toons even did a version of it called “Buster and the Wolverine”
But perhaps the most impressive take of “Peter and the Wolf” is “Peter and the Wolf/Wolf Tracks”
which features Sophia Loren narrating “Peter and the Wolf”, Bill Clinton narrating “Wolf Tracks” and Mikhail Gorbachev reading the introduction and epilogue. “Wolf Tracks” features Peter’s grandson hoping to catch a wolf of his own, in the end, little Peter learns that it is important to protect and preserve the wolf’s habitat.
I’m glad that “Peter and the Wolf” is being popularized for a new generation, but I have to admit, I feel a little uncomfortable with the adapting “Peter and the Wolf” to a political message, even if it is something as positive has preserving natural habitats. The original piece’s only real moral was “wolves are dangerous.” When children’s stories are given a political slant, especially overtly, it tends to come with a certain amount of down-talking, which adults love and children detest.
For more on Peter and the Wolf, try this essay or its excellent Wikipedia page.
Filed under: Project Update
(For those of you new to the site, I decided to spend a year studying music for my New Year’s resolution; for my Chinese New Years resolution I’ve decided to blog about my project to add an analytical element to it. You can read more about my project here.)![]()
It’s been a bit over a month and already I feel like my knowledge of music has expanded in unforeseen ways: the business of market music, the workings of the inner ear and the way we feel music with our sense of touch. My awareness of sound has increased, specifically has I write this on the train I’m aware of the squeal of the brakes, the whoosh of the air conditioning, the rustle of newspapers being read, conversations taking place all around the car, and the vibration of the train on the tracks shaking my legs and pen. In a very real way, I’ve stepped through the looking glass and uncovered another world on top of the world in which I’ve existed.
I did have have a bit of a break, which is why there was a week with no blog post. I think I’ve reached my limit in terms of my rate to absorb new music. Plus, when I latch onto an album I really like, like Bob Dylan’s Bringing It All Back or Girl Talk’s Night Ripper, it becomes difficult to find the time to listen to a new, untested record. My advice, no more than one new album or artist a day, plus, mix it up the medium and genre with live music, documentaries and listening with friends.
What I’ve Been Into:
Al Green Lay it On Me
Billy Bragg and Wilco Mermaid Avenue
Beck Mellow Gold
Beck Odelay
The Beastie Boys The Mix Up
Girl Talk Night Ripper
The Go! Team Thunder Lightning Strike
Kid Rock Rock ‘n’ Roll Jesus
The Klaxons Xan Valley
Panda Bear Personal Pitch
Tony Ragazzo I Got Picked Up Last Night![]()
Robert Johnson The Complete Collection
The Shivers *This band was playing in the 14th St. orange line subway station, I was totally arrested by their sound, it was like something out of Once*
We versus the Shark Ruin Everything!
Wilco Summer Teeth
On My Nightstand
This is Your Brain on Music by Daniel Levitin
Docs
I am Trying to Break Your Heart
Kill Your Idols
No Direction Home
On the Net:
New Scientist Five Great Auditory Illusions *I highly recommend this*
Shout Out Louds live
Art Brut live w/ interview
Filed under: Heads Up
Now I realize that this rooster is voiced by Roger Miller, but doesn’t it seem to look and sound an awful lot like Johnny Cash?
And here he is singing, it’s towards the end of the clip.
Filed under: Reviews
The perfect metaphor for Rock On is in the opening words of its foreword where Dan Kennedy, the author, apologizes and berates himself for the minuscule amount of cussing in the book. “Mister dirty bird can’t even take a minute to find a more mature way of saying something other than cursing a blue streak like an angry motorist or a bitter prison inmate high and insane on homemade prison booze made by cramming a Ziploc baggie with white bread, sugar, ketchup and fruit-cup remnants from the mess hall, then wrapping the baggie in a washrag and letting it rot and ferment behind the hot-water pipe in his cell. I know, I agree with you. Please know I’m not proud of my occasional use of even relatively mild profanity in this book.”
Rock On? Slow down Tipper Gore.
This passage illustrates the style of the entire book, not a lot of content smathered together by some over-written, mediocre prose. To paraphrase Bilbo Baggins, it’s too little butter on too much toast.
Rock On follows Dan Kennedy as he starts working for Atlantic Records just before the bottom falls out of the music industry. In between chapters of anecdotes is a bunch of creative writing 101 filler, lists and fake song lyrics, with titles like “Free Lyrics for Any All-Girl Rock Band Trying to Win Over the Middle-Aged White Suburban Male Demographic.” There’s a lot to be learned about the music industry here, how corporate labels approached marketing an album, how the inability to adapt and excessive salaries presumably doomed the music industry, unfortunately the book is more about Dan Kennedy’s insecurities and need to look down on others.
He makes fun of his bosses for having “Rush hair” or wearing an old blue jean jacket. He acts shocked and appalled that Jewel’s single about being “independent” is used to sell beauty products.
Curious Note: You always know you’re in trouble when the quotes on the front and back of the book are by other writers and not from reviews. Here’s something that you have to do when you’re in the media- ‘”Hilarious.” — Todd Hanson, editor of The Onion‘ is stamped on the front of Rock On. A few weeks after the book was released, this review by Ellen Wernecke showed up in The Onion, “Getting his dream job at Atlantic Records led Dan Kennedy to write two books, a series of pithy, brilliant short pieces, and a more conventional story about the dehumanizing effects of corporations. Those books are unhappily wed between the covers of Rock On: An Office Power Ballad, a memoir about work whose central narrative is as commonplace as the marketing meetings Kennedy lampoons.”
I had finished reading Rock On about a week before reading this review and I felt validated that the reviewer had come to similar conclusions to myself. I was also proud of the reviewer, because since Todd Hanson is most likely Kennedy’s friend, and since his name is on the front of the book, there was likely some sense of obligation to give the book at least an OK review. But then, a week after the review, The Onion published an interview of Dan Kennedy with this introduction, “Kennedy transformed the death of his rock ‘n’ roll fantasy into the scathingly funny Rock On: An Office Power Ballad, turning what could have been another tired eulogy into a funny, darkly comic wake.”
Well, which is it then? I know that it would be ballsy even for The Onion to preface an interview with, “Now, with his new failure of a book, Rock On, out in stores…”but still, I find it amusing that if this book sells at all, it’ll be because The Onion is essentially doing PR for it.
Filed under: Reviews
“Sunday in the Park with George” is a visual marvel, but unfortunately it leaves something to be desired musically, mainly melody.
The play is a fictional account of the pointillist George Seurat’s struggle to paint “Sunday in the Park on the Island of La Grande Jatte.” Each of the figures in the foreground of the painting has been given a character, and, by using projectors to create an optical illusion for a back drop, the painting comes to life.
George, played by Daniel Evans, is completely inaccessible to others, almost autistic in his inability to maintain relationships, and it is painful to watch him and the wall between himself and his lover, cleverly named Dot.
Stephen Sondheim, the author, also wrote “A Funny Thing Happened On the Way to the Forum” and “Sweeney Todd” and the failings of “Sunday in the Park” are the same as “Sweeney Todd.” The songs are often metaphorical, when George dabs his dots the music dot-dot-dots along with him, and this is pleasant enough. And like Sweeney Todd the lyrics are quite clever and this too is well and good. The problem is one of form; the songs are endless and tiresome.
There are only the slightest choruses, every song is packed with piercing notes, and many of the songs are played back-to-back. To get an idea of what I’m talking about check out this version of “Sunday in the Park with George” from an Sondheim tribute concert.
What I learned about Musicals: Songs are just like monologues, special effects or literary devices, they are best used to punctuate the most important parts (like the last clause in a post, wink).
Did you know that when you go to the theater to watch a movie, half of the time is spent staring at a black screen? For each frame of the film the shutter closes twice, meaning no light is being projected towards the screen. Fortunately our brains have a nifty mechanism we refer to as closure that allows us to watch a movie as if it were a steady stream of images. Here’s another nifty example of closure-
Do you see the big “A”? That’s closure. A computer wouldn’t be able to recognize anything except a group of individual “A”’s. This is why you have to punch in random letters and numbers to prove you’re human when setting up a new account online.
Similarly, sound works with moving images to create closure. The sounds you hear when watching a video often have no connection with what you are seeing, but your brain syncs them up. Most of the time it works, sometimes not so much, like when you notice someone lip syncing. This is part of the reason air guitaring is so funny.
Read more of Music and the Moving Image Part 1

